One of the main stylistic choices of the book is to have told in first person narration. The narrator is Amir. The selection of Amir for the narrator is important because of how he views events differently from others. This is evident during the original coup d'etat before Soviet Intervention. Amir lives in an affluent neighborhood, which is barely affected during the change in regime. This is shown when Amir returns to Afghanistan after years in America and states that he "feel[s] like a tourist in his own country." (231). His driver scoffs at this remark and rambles on about Amir's luxurious house and servants. He states that Amir has never known the real Afghanistan, the part which dirt covered beggars roam the streets looking for spare change, instead he has always been a tourist in his own country. Because of Amir's limited viewpoint and the fact that he leaves for America, we do not get a good view of the turmoil in Afghanistan. Included in having Amir as the narrator is we only get his view of when Hassan gets raped. We only get Amir's inner struggle and reliving of that day and his inability to look either Hassan or himself in the eye after doing simply watching the event. Hassan also some issues he has to overcome before trying to return to normal. He has to forgive Amir and be able to go into public without fear, but we do not get to delve into these problems because of the choice of point of view.
Another interesting stylistic choice is the fact that the later part of the novel is written like a journey myth. A journey myth is when a hero is called to an unknown world to retrieve and return with a reward all while facing ordeals along the way. In the case of the novel the hero is Amir and the unknown world is Afghanistan at the turn of the century after the Taliban has taken over. The reward is Hassan's son. The previous part of the novel was character development to make sure that the people involved were complex characters with multiple motives, especially Amir. Amir wants to finally feel at peace for watching Hassan be assaulted, but he also wants to make Baba proud even after his death. He also wants to fulfill Rahim Khan's dying wish. Finally, Amir has gotten a wife of his own now and wants to return safely to America. By having the story act like a journey myth enforces the reasoning behind choosing Amir as the narrator. Khaled Hosseini wants to make the reader feel everything that his hero feels on his journey. He clearly uses the technique to make the novel about Amir's adventures instead of him living in Kabul as Afghanistan drastically changes.
Another interesting stylistic choice is the fact that the later part of the novel is written like a journey myth. A journey myth is when a hero is called to an unknown world to retrieve and return with a reward all while facing ordeals along the way. In the case of the novel the hero is Amir and the unknown world is Afghanistan at the turn of the century after the Taliban has taken over. The reward is Hassan's son. The previous part of the novel was character development to make sure that the people involved were complex characters with multiple motives, especially Amir. Amir wants to finally feel at peace for watching Hassan be assaulted, but he also wants to make Baba proud even after his death. He also wants to fulfill Rahim Khan's dying wish. Finally, Amir has gotten a wife of his own now and wants to return safely to America. By having the story act like a journey myth enforces the reasoning behind choosing Amir as the narrator. Khaled Hosseini wants to make the reader feel everything that his hero feels on his journey. He clearly uses the technique to make the novel about Amir's adventures instead of him living in Kabul as Afghanistan drastically changes.
I agree with your analysis of the author's style and how the novel has been set up until this reading. I never thought of this portion as a journey myth and clearly I should have been! One thing I am curious about is your thoughts on the importance of putting Farsi language into dialogue. Does it show more depth in the character? You also discussed how Amir is "a tourist in his own country." Do you think that if he and Baba decided to stay in their Afghanistan home instead of moving to America, he would still feel as strongly as he does about being a "tourist?" You did a great job analyzing the unique stylistic approaches the author uses throughout this portion of the book.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion on the Farsi is that those words have more meaning to Amir and therefore more significance than the English translation. I also believe that the Farsi is used in place of English because of the lack of direct translation. I believe that if Amir and Baba had stayed in Afghanistan that they would feel like the country was one that they did not know that well, but they would not feel like complete tourists. The time away and the drastic change in the environment really caused Amir to feel like a tourist and if he stayed he would have adapted to his surroundings and lived through the ordeal.
DeleteFrom your description Amir seems fairly arrogant, is that a fair statement? If so, is his arrogance the reason he views everything differently than others? Does this also make him an unideal hero in the journey myth in that he's not particularly admirable? Or does he have some redeeming qualities and/or transform into a better person over the course of the book?
ReplyDeleteAmir is fairly arrogant when he was younger, up until Hassan is raped, but he loses it when he moves to America and is no longer in the wealthy class. He views things differently from others because he is not in the middle of the issue. His affluence allows him to be more of an observer during Afghanistan's struggles than a participate. In terms of his journey, I do not think that he is an ideal hero, but his cause is very admirable.
DeleteGood recognition and discussion of the journey myth that occurs in the novel, as well as recognition of the guilt that influences Amir to make the choices that he does.
ReplyDeleteDo you find that the journey myth in this novel is more or less satisfying than in Song of Solomon?
I find this journey more satisfying than in Song of Solomon because this journey is about redemption and not just finding oneself. I also like how there is more action before the call to the journey so the plot keeps moving. I also like Amir as a character more than Milkman and think his specific reason for going on the journey is better.
DeleteI thought think that the discussion of the journey myth was well worded and was a nice realization of the story. By placing this story in the category of a journey myth, you show that you understand the character's past, what he needs to do currently, and you can create logical predictions of Amir's future. I, too, thought it was interesting how the author creates this story from the perspective of Amir only and how the reader only sees the struggle of Amir who watched the rape. Usually in a story, the author would also write about the struggle of the person hurt. But in this scenario, the reader understands the other side of the situation.
ReplyDelete